T-importance of international finance pdf for profit in order to make social comment. High Court and appellant in the SCA.
The respondent approached the High Court as applicant. South Africa and resisting censorship. LABEL trade marks in class 32. T-shirts, billboards and advertising on taxis. The only real difference was in the wording. It had been marketing T-shirts using at least eleven other brands.
The SCA dismissed the appeal on several grounds. T-shirts in order to sell them. Label brand is currently marketed in South Africa. However there is an important difference.
It is to that task that I now turn. It is not even an unqualified right. No such facts have been pleaded. I simply do not agree.
We must decline the invitation. T-shirts advanced by the respondent. This is so because, firstly, it is unnecessary. SCA and in this Court. Supreme Court of Appeal is set aside. Court of Appeal and in this Court.
Lusty Lively Exploitation Since 1652, No Regard Given Worldwide’. T-shirts was, and remains, interdicted. Goliaths of this world who need trademark protection. Everything will depend on the context. The list is by no means exhaustive. Carling Black Label drinkers get more at the end of the day.
Write a letter to the editor? I have given, however, points the other way. It is not to the particular beer as such. As such it, could serve as an over-deterrent. Trademark parodies, even when offensive, do convey a message.
Constitution cannot oblige the dour to laugh. Laugh it Off to advance subversive humour. Humour is one of the great solvents of democracy. I fully support the order made by Moseneke J. See para 2 of this judgment. Need Intellectual Property Be Everywhere?
Interpretation of Bill of Rights. Trade Marks Act 194 of 1993. USC section 1051 et seq. Rutherford above n 20 at 55. Mostert above n 9 at 58-9.