Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. While Keynes had focused on the value price theory milton friedman pdf of currency, with the resulting panics based on an insufficient money supply leading to alternate currency and collapse, then Friedman focused on price stability, which is the equilibrium between supply and demand for money.
The book attributed inflation to excess money supply generated by a central bank. Under this rule, there would be no leeway for the central reserve bank, as money supply increases could be determined “by a computer”, and business could anticipate all money supply changes. With other monetarists he believed that the active manipulation of the money supply or its growth rate is more likely to destabilise than stabilise the economy. Friedman, for example, viewed a pure gold standard as impractical. Similarly, if the money supply were reduced people would want to replenish their holdings of money by reducing their spending. In this, Friedman challenged a simplification attributed to Keynes suggesting that “money does not matter.
Thus the word ‘monetarist’ was coined. The result was a major rise in interest rates, not only in the United States but worldwide. Monetarist economists never recognized that the policy implemented by the Federal Reserve from 1979 was a monetarist policy. US monetary policy: even the members of the FOMC who were not monetarists took monetarist influence into strong consideration. 1930 was caused by a massive contraction of the money supply and not by the lack of investment Keynes had argued.
They also maintained that post-war inflation was caused by an over-expansion of the money supply. They made famous the assertion of monetarism that ‘inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon’. Many Keynesian economists initially believed that the Keynesian vs. By the mid-1970s, however, the debate had moved on to other issues as monetarists began presenting a fundamental challenge to Keynesianism. Many monetarists sought to resurrect the pre-Keynesian view that market economies are inherently stable in the absence of major unexpected fluctuations in the money supply. The basis of this argument is an equilibrium between “stimulus” fiscal spending and future interest rates.